When you're not in a very good mood, the last thing you want to see is yet another stupid article in the Shits Times spewing nonsense about homosexuality AGAIN.

What's with the recent spate of people suddenly so up in arms after a remark by the Divine Emperor about the possibility of repealing s377A of the Penal Code?

But today's article by a Yvonne Lee really, REALLY takes the cake.

Let's get this straight (pun intended), I'm as hetero as someone could possibly be. I still cringe when I see gay intimacy on Six Feet Under. But I do not think it is wrong, or against nature, or whatever. It is a lifestyle choice, and it harms no one, no matter what the bible thumping masses might say. To even debate on whether it should be criminalised or not should have been a no-brainer in a civilized country. But I forget. I live in Singapore.

Let's have a look a at few choice quotes from this stupid idiot who's apparently a law professor. Well thank god I didn't get my law degree from NUS then.

It is a known medical fact that homosexual intercourse or sodomy is an inherently unhealthy act that carries higher risks of a number of sexually transmitted infections.

OMG like hetero sex is any cleaner? When's the last time this woman ever saw dick or touched her own pussy? Here's a clue lady, THEY'RE ALL DIRTY. You get aids, gonorrhea, herpes, crabs, syphilis and all sorts of other shit (again, pun intended) through hetero sex too you know? Just because you don't like dick up your ass doesn't mean it's any dirtier than hetero sex.

People who oppose the homosexual agenda are branded as intolerant, bigoted, homophobes, or hateful towards homosexuals who are merely 'different'.

Do you know why? It's BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING FUCKING WRONG WITH BEING A HOMOSEXUAL YOU STUPID COW! SO ANYBODY WHO IS OPPOSING A HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE IS AUTOMATICALLY A FUCKING IDIOT WHO IS OPEN TO RIDICULE BY ALL AND SUNDRY!

The final step involves attempts to redefine 'marriage', the fundamental institution and bedrock of many civilisations. The redefinition is a radical reconstruction of 'marriage' - no longer a union between man and woman but includes 'same-sex marriage'. Homosexuals must then be allowed to marry someone of the same sex and be given the benefits of marriage such as tax benefits, adoption of children and/or state-funded access to alternative 'reproduction' methods.

Who wrote the fucking book on marriage saying that it should be between a man and a woman? The fucking Bible innit? Well fuck that shit ok? It's 2007, it's really about time people stopped referring to a fucking 2000 year old book.

It has been suggested that even after adultery was decriminalised, it remained morally reprehensible. So too, decriminalising homosexual sex will not cause a shift in moral attitudes.

How is adultery even like homosexuality? That's like comparing grapes to shoes. Seriously woman, it's probably a GOOD THING you're not a practicing litigation lawyer, otherwise everytime someone got you as an opponent they'd be jumping for joy shouting "I'M SO GONNA PWN HER!". You lose at being a lawyer really.

Homosexuality is offensive to the majority of citizens. Allowing an aggressive homosexual rights agenda to dictate law reform ignores the nature of Singapore's multireligious, multiracial community. Such an agenda would be divisive.

What? This really is the opus magnmum of her imbecility. What you really mean, I think, is that homosexuality is OFFENSIVE TO INTOLERANT, STUPID, IDIOTIC, MYSOGINISTIC, MYOPIC, RETARDED, BIBLE-THUMPING CRACKPOTS LIKE YOU. Stop using words like "majority" if you don't have numbers to back it up with. Why don't you go out on the streets and take a fucking straw poll?

Seriously. This stupid woman's article is so offensive on so many levels it actually lowers my IQ to have to read it and struggle to respond to it because it actually meant that I had to lower myself to her level.